Award-winning musician Zakes Bantwini has unleashed a blistering attack at an international record label suing him for breach of contract and threatened to apply for an exception to its particulars of claims because they are “vague” and “embarrassing”.
Paradise Sound System (PSS) has filed a R2.4-million lawsuit at the Johannesburg High Court against Zakes Bantwini’s company, Mayonie Productions, after it accused it of signing a marketing and sales deal with rival record label Universal Music.
PSS, otherwise known as Paradise Africa Distribution, said it concluded a written exclusive master recording agreement with the artist on August 6 2021.
In terms of the agreement, which was supposed to be in effect for 10 years, the musician’s company granted PSS the right to exploit and distribute the album’s audio and audio visual products in territories of America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe.
It also granted PSS the right to sell Zakes Bantwini’s songs anywhere in the world, excluding Africa, on popular online music stores such as Traxsource and Beartport.
The muso’s company further authorised PSS to allow service providers and other third parties to digitally exploit the album in all technical formats and products via digital distribution.
In addition to the non-physical exploitation, Zakes Bantwini’s company authorised PSS to exploit and to permit physical exploitation of the album, which was released in 2021, through service providers.
PSS agreed to pay Mayonie Productions 50% of the net profit on the exploitation of the album.
The muso’s label indemnified and held PSS harmless from any damages, liabilities, costs, losses and expenses arising out of or connected to any claim, action or demand by a third party.
PSS said Mayonie Productions breached the contract when it signed an agreement with Universal Music on October 27 2016, in which the musician, born Zakhele Madida, granted it exclusive rights to exploit the album for 10 years from October 12 2016.
The deal between Zakes Bantwini and Universal Music meant that he no longer held the exclusive exploitation rights to the album and rendered their agreement invalid.
The company said were it not for the breach, it would have exclusively exploited the album and derived commercial value from it until at least 2030, and earned a profit of no less than R2 402 754.
In a defence notice filed in court this week, Zakes Bantwini’s company said it intends to apply to the court to review and set aside the PSS’ particulars of claims as “irregular step”. The company also intends to apply for an exception to the record label’s particulars of claims because they are “vague” and “embarrassing”.
It charged that PSS failed to provide a breakdown of actual or estimated revenue it alleges it would have received from each underlying source of the three revenues stated in the lawsuit.
In addition, said Zakes Bantwini’s company said PSS claims that it was entitled to 50% of the net profit earned from the exploitation of the album across each of the revenue streams and also stated in the court papers an alleged or estimated income from each of the revenue streams and total net profit of the various periods of revenue.
But, it said, PSS failed to state the monthly income for each revenue stream as opposed to the various periods of revenue being monthly for 2021, 10 yearly for 2022, and ultimately a globular amount spanning eight years from 2023 to 2030.
Mayonie Productions further said PSS also failed to state the categories of expenses likely to have been incurred in the generation of the alleged income from each of the revenue streams in exploiting the album, and noted that PSS failed to indicate the estimated amount of each such expenses for each relevant period.
“In the circumstances, the plaintiff’s particulars of claim are vague and embarrassing and fail to set out the plaintiff’s alleged damages in such a manner as to enable the defendant to reasonably assess the alleged quantum. The defendant is accordingly prejudiced thereby in pleading to the plaintiff’s particulars of claims,” read the papers.
Zakes Bantwini asked PSS to remove causes of complaint within 15 days and threatened to deliver an exception to the latter’s particulars of claims.
Alternatively, the company will apply to court to set aside the PSS’ particulars of claims as an irregular proceeding.
Follow @SundayWorldZA on Twitter and @sundayworldza on Instagram, or like our Facebook Page, Sunday World, by clicking here for the latest breaking news in South Africa. To Subscribe to Sunday World, click here.