Reader letter: Dying trees should be taken down before damage occurs

Article content

When a dead or dying tree is on municipal land, it seems to be taken care of usually before it causes any damage.

Article content

Would that be because of liability issues?

Yet on personal or corporate land you can seemingly just let it fall, including on your neighbour’s property with no liabilities.

That might lead to someone’s insurance paying for the damage and then rates will go up over something which you have no control.

I know you can’t always tell when a tree is dying, but in obvious cases the property owner should take care of it or be held responsible. I feel there needs to be a bylaw in place before any damage occurs.

What’s the cost of taking a tree down compared to thousands of dollars in damages, maybe even injury?

Whatever happened to common sense?

Dave Massey, Lasalle Ont.

Share Your Views

Send letters to the editor to (Don’t send them as attachments; put them in the body of the emails). Letters must include your full name, address and phone number. (We will only publish your name and the municipality where you live). Letters must be fewer than 300 words. The Star reserves the right to edit, condense and reject letters.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.